Celeron E1400 vs Athlon II X2 270u

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 270u
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.42
Celeron E1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46
+9.5%

Celeron E1400 outperforms Athlon II X2 270u by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29812935
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.590.67
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$68$57

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size117 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistors410 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 270u 0.42
Celeron E1400 0.46
+9.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 270u 675
Celeron E1400 735
+8.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.46
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon II X2 270u has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

Celeron E1400, on the other hand, has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron E1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 270u
Athlon II X2 270u
Intel Celeron E1400
Celeron E1400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 270u on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 63 votes

Rate Celeron E1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 270u or Celeron E1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.