Phenom X4 9150e vs Athlon II X2 255

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 255
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76
Phenom X4 9150e
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
0.91
+19.7%

Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25582431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.023.48
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data
Current price$16.55 (0.3x MSRP)$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom X4 9150e has 17300% better value for money than Athlon II X2 255.

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size117 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors410 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 255 0.76
Phenom X4 9150e 0.91
+19.7%

Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X2 255 1170
Phenom X4 9150e 1414
+20.9%

Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by 21% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X2 255 324
+38.5%
Phenom X4 9150e 234

Athlon II X2 255 outperforms Phenom X4 9150e by 38% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X2 255 534
Phenom X4 9150e 817
+53%

Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.91
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

The Phenom X4 9150e is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 255 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 255 and Phenom X4 9150e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 255
Athlon II X2 255
AMD Phenom X4 9150e
Phenom X4 9150e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 155 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate Phenom X4 9150e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 255 or Phenom X4 9150e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.