A4-9120C vs Athlon II X2 250

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 250
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.69
+25.5%
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.55

Athlon II X2 250 outperforms A4-9120C by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27232840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.61no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.998.51
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache256 KB160 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size117 mm2124.5 mm2
Number of transistors410 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 250 0.69
+25.5%
A4-9120C 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 250 1080
+27.1%
A4-9120C 850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.55
Recency 2 June 2009 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Athlon II X2 250 has a 25.5% higher aggregate performance score.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II X2 250 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X2 250 is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 250 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1152 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 77 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 250 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.