Pentium III 1000 vs Athlon II P320
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II P320 and Pentium III 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon II | no data |
| Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
| Release date | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 8 March 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $990 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II P320 and Pentium III 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 106 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II P320 and Pentium III 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | S1g4 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 33 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P320 and Pentium III 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 May 2010 | 8 March 2000 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 33 Watt |
Athlon II P320 has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 32% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II P320 and Pentium III 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon II P320 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1000 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P320 and Pentium III 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
