FX-6120 vs Athlon II Neo K145
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1664 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.41 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon II Neo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Nile (2010) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 15 December 2010 (13 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 2000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3 memory controller | no data |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| VirusProtect | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
FX-6120 outperforms Athlon II Neo K145 by 1204% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 December 2010 | 23 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 95 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon II Neo K145 is a notebook processor while FX-6120 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II Neo K145 and FX-6120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
