Celeron 585 vs Athlon II Neo K145
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3479 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon II Neo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.60 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Nile (2010) | no data |
| Release date | 15 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 July 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron 585 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.16 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 2000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.95-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron 585 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron 585. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron 585 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron 585 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and Celeron 585. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 December 2010 | 1 July 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 31 Watt |
Athlon II Neo K145 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 158.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon II Neo K145 and Intel Celeron 585. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
