C-60 vs Athlon II Neo K145

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II Neo K145
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 12 Watt
0.19
C-60
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.20
+5.3%

C-60 outperforms Athlon II Neo K145 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32533232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon II NeoAMD C-Series
Power efficiency1.502.10
Architecture codenameNile (2010)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date15 December 2010 (14 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate2000 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II Neo K145 0.19
C-60 0.20
+5.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II Neo K145 298
C-60 316
+6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.20
Recency 15 December 2010 22 August 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 9 Watt

C-60 has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II Neo K145 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II Neo K145
Athlon II Neo K145
AMD C-60
C-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 8 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 244 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II Neo K145 or C-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.