Core i3-2308M vs Athlon II Neo K125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon II NeoIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameGeneva (2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)20 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Current priceno data$136

Detailed specifications

Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus support2000 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Number of transistorsno data624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1rPGA988B / BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3 memory controllerno data
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2010 20 February 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II Neo K125 and Core i3-2308M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II Neo K125
Athlon II Neo K125
Intel Core i3-2308M
Core i3-2308M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 13 votes

Rate Core i3-2308M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II Neo K125 or Core i3-2308M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.