FX-8100 vs Athlon II M300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II M300 and FX-8100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.62
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date10 September 2009 (14 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$40 $78

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II M300 and FX-8100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support3200 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II M300 and FX-8100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (S1g3)AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II M300 and FX-8100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization, DDR2 400 MHz Memory Controllerno data
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
PowerNow+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II M300 and FX-8100 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II M300 and FX-8100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II M300 and FX-8100.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II M300 670
FX-8100 4046
+504%

FX-8100 outperforms Athlon II M300 by 504% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II M300 213
FX-8100 411
+93%

FX-8100 outperforms Athlon II M300 by 93% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II M300 403
FX-8100 1819
+351%

FX-8100 outperforms Athlon II M300 by 351% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2009 12 October 2011
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon II M300 and FX-8100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon II M300 is a notebook processor while FX-8100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II M300 and FX-8100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II M300
Athlon II M300
AMD FX-8100
FX-8100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 59 votes

Rate Athlon II M300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 61 vote

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II M300 or FX-8100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.