EPYC 7573X vs Athlon II M300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II M300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.71
+10307%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Athlon II M300 by a whopping 10307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking298449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Power efficiency1.1414.77
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Milan-X (2022)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (S1g3)SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II M300 0.42
EPYC 7573X 43.71
+10307%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II M300 670
EPYC 7573X 69432
+10263%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 43.71
Recency 10 September 2009 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Athlon II M300 has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has a 10307.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II M300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon II M300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II M300 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II M300
Athlon II M300
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 60 votes

Rate Athlon II M300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II M300 or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.