Itanium 9560 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3033 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.70 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tyler (2007−2009) | no data |
| Release date | 1 November 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.53 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 0 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket S1 | LGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNow | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| VT-i | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 November 2009 | 1 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 170 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 has 750% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9560, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is a notebook processor while Itanium 9560 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and Itanium 9560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
