Core i5-6442EQ vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Aggregated performance score
Core i5-6442EQ outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by 392% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2670 | 1557 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.03 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | Intel Core i5 |
| Architecture codename | Toledo (2006) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | no data | 12 October 2015 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $250 |
| Current price | no data | $3337 (13.3x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Bus support | 1000 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 122 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 2.90 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 25 Watt |
The Core i5-6442EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 in performance tests.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is a desktop processor while Core i5-6442EQ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core i5-6442EQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
