Phenom II X3 P840 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.41
Phenom II X3 P840
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 1 Watt
0.76
+85.4%

Phenom II X3 P840 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32342875
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)3x AMD Phenom II
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release dateno data4 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom II X3 P840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache256K384 KB
L2 cache512K1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Number of transistors233 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom II X3 P840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939S1
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB1.5 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom II X3 P840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom II X3 P840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Phenom II X3 P840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 0.76
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 1 Watt

Phenom II X3 P840 has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The AMD Phenom II X3 P840 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop processor while Phenom II X3 P840 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Phenom II X3 P840
Phenom II X3 P840

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 107 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Phenom II X3 P840, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.