Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Sempron 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release dateDecember 2006 (17 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309$13

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Sempron 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache256K128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size220 mm2103 mm2
Number of transistors154 million63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Sempron 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939939
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Sempron 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 731
+191%
Sempron 3200+ 251

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 62 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Sempron 3200+, on the other hand, has 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Sempron 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Sempron 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
AMD Sempron 3200+
Sempron 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 149 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 26 votes

Rate Sempron 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4200+ or Sempron 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.