Pentium III 866 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Pentium III 866 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2940not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.49no data
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Coppermine T (2000)
Release dateDecember 2006 (18 years ago)20 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Pentium III 866 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.87 GHz
L1 cache256K32 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm180 nm
Die size220 mm2106 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors154 million28 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Pentium III 866 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket939370
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt27 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 27 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4200+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium III 866, on the other hand, has 229.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Pentium III 866. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and Pentium III 866, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Intel Pentium III  866
Pentium III 866

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 149 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 33 votes

Rate Pentium III 866 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4200+ or Pentium III 866, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.