D-1513N vs Athlon 64 TF-20

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon 64Intel Xeon D
Power efficiency0.61no data
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)no data$192

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache0.1 MB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1g1no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.861 GB/s

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 64 TF-20 has 40% lower power consumption.

D-1513N, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while D-1513N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and D-1513N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
Intel D-1513N
D-1513N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate D-1513N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or D-1513N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.