Xeon Platinum 8354H vs Athlon 64 FX-76
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | November 2006 (17 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 24.75 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 235 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | F | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 18 |
| Threads | 2 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 205 Watt |
Athlon 64 FX-76 has 64% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8354H, on the other hand, has 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 FX-76 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8354H is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Xeon Platinum 8354H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
