Pentium N3530 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-62
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.64
Pentium N3530
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.77
+20.3%

Pentium N3530 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26652545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)Intel Pentium
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2009)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release dateno data23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$28 $223

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus support1000 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data896 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-62 0.64
Pentium N3530 0.77
+20.3%

Pentium N3530 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon 64 FX-62 993
Pentium N3530 1187
+19.5%

Pentium N3530 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by 20% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.77
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 7 Watt

The Pentium N3530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-62 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop processor while Pentium N3530 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium N3530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
Intel Pentium N3530
Pentium N3530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 165 votes

Rate Pentium N3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or Pentium N3530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.