Pentium 4 HT 3.00 vs Athlon 64 FX-57
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3303 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.12 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | San Diego (2001−2005) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | June 2005 (20 years ago) | April 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 115 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 939 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 104 Watt | 82 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-57 and Pentium 4 HT 3.00. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 104 Watt | 82 Watt |
Athlon 64 FX-57 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 4 HT 3.00, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 26.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
