Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Athlon 64 FX-57

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameSan Diego (2001−2005)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$284

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size115 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors114 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Duo SL9300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 511.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-57 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo SL9300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-57 and Core 2 Duo SL9300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
Athlon 64 FX-57
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300
Core 2 Duo SL9300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-57 or Core 2 Duo SL9300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.