Sempron 130 vs Athlon 64 FX-55

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date10 October 2004 (19 years ago)1 August 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180$25

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm45 nm
Die size193 mm2117 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939AM3
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt45 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-55 404
Sempron 130 511
+26.5%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2004 1 August 2011
Chip lithography 130 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 45 Watt

Sempron 130 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 131.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Sempron 130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
AMD Sempron 130
Sempron 130

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 9 votes

Rate Sempron 130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-55 or Sempron 130, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.