Processor N200 vs Athlon 64 FX-55

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiencyno data24.62
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date10 October 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180$193

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2004 3 January 2023
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N200 has an age advantage of 18 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-55 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 141 vote

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-55 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.