Xeon Platinum 8175 vs Athlon 64 FX-51
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2004) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | September 2003 (20 years ago) | no data |
| Current price | $30 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | 940 | Socket P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 FX-51 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8175 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-51 and Xeon Platinum 8175, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
