Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ vs Athlon 64 3800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3800+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.36
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 350 Watt
45.34
+12494%

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ outperforms Athlon 64 3800+ by a whopping 12494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking325963
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.014.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.175.48
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameVenice (2004−2005)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateJune 2004 (21 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160$6,497

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ has 49100% better value for money than Athlon 64 3800+.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads196
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size230 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C81 °C
Number of transistors227 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket9394677
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 3800+ 0.36
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ 45.34
+12494%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 3800+ 635
Samples: 236
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ 79683
+12449%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 45.34
Physical cores 1 48
Threads 1 96
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 350 Watt

Athlon 64 3800+ has 293.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, on the other hand, has a 12494.4% higher aggregate performance score, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 3800+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3800+ is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3800+
Athlon 64 3800+
Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8568Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 3800+ and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.