Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs Athlon 64 3600+

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3600+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.34
+127%

Athlon 64 3600+ outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33193577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataPentium 4-M
Power efficiency0.41no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateJune 2004 (21 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache128Kno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt512 KB

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.15
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 512 Watt

Athlon 64 3600+ has a 126.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 475.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon 64 3600+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3600+ is a desktop processor while Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.