Ryzen 5 3500U vs Athlon 64 3500+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1311
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameSan Diego (2001−2005)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography130 nm12 nm
Die size230 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors227 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket939FP5
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3500+ 377
Ryzen 5 3500U 6943
+1742%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 3500+ 129
Ryzen 5 3500U 860
+567%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 3500+ 116
Ryzen 5 3500U 2474
+2033%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500U has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3500+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3500+ and Ryzen 5 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Athlon 64 3500+
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 52 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8574 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3500+ or Ryzen 5 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.