Opteron X2 180 vs Athlon 64 3400+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3400+ and Opteron X2 180 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3231not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.21no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Denmark (2005−2006)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)26 September 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3400+ and Opteron X2 180 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Die size193 mm2199 mm2
Number of transistors105 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3400+ and Opteron X2 180 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket754939
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt110 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3400+ and Opteron X2 180. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 110 Watt

Athlon 64 3400+ has 23.6% lower power consumption.

Opteron X2 180, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3400+ and Opteron X2 180. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3400+ is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 180 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3400+ and Opteron X2 180, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Athlon 64 3400+
AMD Opteron X2 180
Opteron X2 180

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 20 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Opteron X2 180 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3400+ or Opteron X2 180, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.