Mobile Pentium III 650 vs Athlon 64 3200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3200+ and Mobile Pentium III 650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.20no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Coppermine (1999−2001)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)18 January 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$637

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3200+ and Mobile Pentium III 650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.65 GHz
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache512K256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size193 mm2106 mm2
Number of transistors154 million28 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3200+ and Mobile Pentium III 650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754Intel Micro-BGA2
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt22 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3200+ and Mobile Pentium III 650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 22 Watt

Athlon 64 3200+ has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium III 650, on the other hand, has 304.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3200+ and Mobile Pentium III 650. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3200+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium III 650 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3200+ and Mobile Pentium III 650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+
Intel Mobile Pentium III 650
Mobile Pentium III 650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Pentium III 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3200+ or Mobile Pentium III 650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.