Athlon 1300 vs Athlon 64 3200+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.20no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Thunderbird B (2000−2001)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)21 March 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$318

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512K256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size193 mm2120 mm2
Number of transistors154 million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754A
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt68 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 68 Watt

Athlon 64 3200+ has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1300, on the other hand, has 30.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+
AMD Athlon 1300
Athlon 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3200+ or Athlon 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.