Atom E640 vs Athlon 64 3000+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3523 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.09 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2006) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
| Release date | January 2001 (25 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon 64 3000+ and Atom E640: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Atom E640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | Intel BGA 676 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Atom E640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Atom E640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 3 Watt |
Atom E640 has 100% more threads, a 189% more advanced lithography process, and 2867% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 3000+ and Intel Atom E640. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Atom E640 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
