A8-4557M vs Athlon 64 3000+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3488 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.23 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 3000+ and A8-4557M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | 1303 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and A8-4557M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 4 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and A8-4557M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7640G (497 - 655 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 4 Watt |
A8-4557M has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2125% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 3000+ and AMD A8-4557M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while A8-4557M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
