Pentium M ULV 900 vs Athlon 64 2800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M ULV 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataPentium M
Architecture codenameNewCastle (2004)Banias (2003)
Release dateApril 2004 (20 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M ULV 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Number of transistors69 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M ULV 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt7 Watt

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 7 Watt

Pentium M ULV 900 has 1171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M ULV 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 2800+ is a desktop processor while Pentium M ULV 900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2800+ and Pentium M ULV 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2800+
Athlon 64 2800+
Intel Pentium M ULV 900
Pentium M ULV 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 35 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Pentium M ULV 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2800+ or Pentium M ULV 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.