Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Athlon 64 2000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 2000+
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 8 Watt
0.10
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.08
+13980%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Athlon 64 2000+ by a whopping 13980% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2000+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3381523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency1.1847.34
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release dateJune 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2000+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Number of transistors122 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2000+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2FP8
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 2000+ 0.10
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.08
+13980%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 2000+ 154
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22366
+14423%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 14.08
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 28 Watt

Athlon 64 2000+ has 250% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 13980% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 2000+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 2000+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2000+ and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Athlon 64 2000+
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 13 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2000+ or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.