E1-2500 vs Athlon 5150

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 5150
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.87
+135%
E1-2500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.37

Athlon 5150 outperforms E1-2500 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 5150 and E1-2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25613033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency3.282.32
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 5150 and E1-2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 5150 and E1-2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FT3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 5150 and E1-2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 5150 and E1-2500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 5150 and E1-2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8240
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 5150 and E1-2500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 5150 and E1-2500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 5150 and E1-2500.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 5150 0.87
+135%
E1-2500 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 5150 1388
+134%
E1-2500 593

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 5150 173
+23.6%
E1-2500 140

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 5150 476
+102%
E1-2500 236

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 0.37
Recency 9 April 2014 23 May 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 5150 has a 135.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

E1-2500, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 5150 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-2500 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 5150 is a desktop processor while E1-2500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 5150 and E1-2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 5150
Athlon 5150
AMD E1-2500
E1-2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Athlon 5150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 114 votes

Rate E1-2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 5150 or E1-2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.