Ryzen 3 3350U vs Athlon 3000G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.93
Ryzen 3 3350U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.80
+29.7%

Ryzen 3 3350U outperforms Athlon 3000G by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16661481
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonPicasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency7.6323.10
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date7 November 2019 (4 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache192 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GB?no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.93
Ryzen 3 3350U 3.80
+29.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 3000G 4482
Ryzen 3 3350U 5813
+29.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.93 3.80
Integrated graphics card 2.98 3.04
Recency 7 November 2019 6 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 3000G has an age advantage of 10 months.

Ryzen 3 3350U, on the other hand, has a 29.7% higher aggregate performance score, 2% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3350U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3350U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Ryzen 3 3350U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U
Ryzen 3 3350U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2060 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 40 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3350U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or Ryzen 3 3350U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.