i9-14900F vs Athlon 3000G

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.46
+945%

Core i9-14900F outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 945% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1681145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.2750.61
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.6242.87
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date21 November 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900F has 860% better value for money than Athlon 3000G.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB?192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.82
i9-14900F 29.46
+945%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 3000G 4476
i9-14900F 46790
+945%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 3000G 956
i9-14900F 2871
+200%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 3000G 1958
i9-14900F 18365
+838%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.82 29.46
Recency 21 November 2019 8 January 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 3000G has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i9-14900F, on the other hand, has a 944.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-14900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2112 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.