Celeron 5305U vs Athlon 3000G
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1687 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.60 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 21 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2? | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB? | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 November 2019 | 1 April 2020 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon 3000G has 100% more threads.
Celeron 5305U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Celeron 5305U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Celeron 5305U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
