Atom Z3735G vs Athlon 3000G
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 3000G outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 476% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1681 | 2906 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.62 | 23.17 |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 21 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $17 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2? | 112 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | UTFCBGA592 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB? | 1 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 5.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 646 MHz |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.82 | 0.49 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.98 | 0.77 |
| Recency | 21 November 2019 | 9 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 2 Watt |
Athlon 3000G has a 475.5% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 1650% lower power consumption.
The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.
Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
