Athlon 300U vs Athlon 200GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.59
+6.6%
Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.43

Athlon 200GE outperforms Athlon 300U by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17361772
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD Athlon
Power efficiency7.0015.32
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$55no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplier3224
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 200GE 2.59
+6.6%
Athlon 300U 2.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 200GE 4116
+6.4%
Athlon 300U 3867

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.59 2.43
Recency 1 June 2018 6 January 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 200GE has a 6.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon 300U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U.

Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Athlon 300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 200GE
Athlon 200GE
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 769 votes

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 460 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 200GE or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.