Atom Z620 vs Athlon 200GE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1999 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 7.13 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 June 2018 (7 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and Atom Z620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 32 | 9 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and Atom Z620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom Z620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom Z620 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom Z620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | PowerVR SGX535 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom Z620.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2018 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 1 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z620, on the other hand, has 3400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 200GE and Intel Atom Z620. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Atom Z620 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
