Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Apple M5 Pro 15-Core
Aggregate performance score
M5 Pro 15-Core outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 234 | 544 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.28 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.72 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 3 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 13 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M5 Pro 15-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 15 (Pentadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 15 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 68 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on M5 Pro 15-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M5 Pro 15-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M5 Pro 15-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M5 Pro 15-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M5 Pro 15-Core and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 60 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.47 | 16.05 |
| Recency | 3 March 2026 | 13 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 15 | 16 |
| Threads | 15 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
Apple M5 Pro 15-Core has a 77% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, on the other hand, has 7% more physical cores and 113% more threads.
The Apple M5 Pro 15-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M5 Pro 15-Core is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
