Apple M1 Max vs Apple M5 Max
Aggregate performance score
M5 Max outperforms M1 Max by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | 736 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Designer | Apple | Apple |
| Release date | 3 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M5 Max and M1 Max: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 18 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M5 Max and M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | W |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.24 | 12.81 |
| Recency | 3 March 2026 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 10 |
| Threads | 18 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M5 Max has a 159% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 80% more physical cores and 80% more threads, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M5 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 Max in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
