Xeon Phi 3120A vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 308 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 17 June 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Phi 3120A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 57 (Heptapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 228 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 350 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Phi 3120A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Phi 3120A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Phi 3120A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Phi 3120A are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Phi 3120A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 17 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 57 |
| Threads | 14 | 228 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 300 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has an age advantage of 11 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 7400% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 3120A, on the other hand, has 307.1% more physical cores and 1528.6% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Intel Xeon Phi 3120A. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 3120A is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
