Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Xeon E5-2648L v4 by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 180 | 965 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.58 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Apple M4 | Intel Xeon E5 |
Power efficiency | 64.26 | 9.65 |
Architecture codename | no data | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,544 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 14 | 28 |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus type | no data | QPI |
Bus rate | no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 18 |
L2 cache | no data | 3.5 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 35 MB |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 306.18 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 4700 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 27.16 | 7.65 |
Recency | 30 October 2024 | 20 June 2016 |
Threads | 14 | 28 |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 255% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2648L v4, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2648L v4 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2648L v4 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon E5-2648L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.