Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 314 | 329 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.94 | 16.34 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Gorgon Point |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 54 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.73 | 20.89 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 12 |
| Threads | 14 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 54 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, 16.7% more physical cores, and 35% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, on the other hand, has 71.4% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
