GX-215JJ vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking180not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency64.26no data
Architecture codenameno dataPrairie Falcon (2016−2018)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)23 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads142
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 20-core GPURadeon R2E 2CU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 23 February 2016
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 14 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 6 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has an age advantage of 8 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

GX-215JJ, on the other hand, has 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while GX-215JJ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and GX-215JJ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
AMD GX-215JJ
GX-215JJ

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GX-215JJ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or GX-215JJ, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.