EPYC Embedded 9654P vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 64.21 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 14 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 14 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 12x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 14 March 2023 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 96 |
| Threads | 14 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 360 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 9654P, on the other hand, has 585.7% more physical cores and 1271.4% more threads.
We couldn't decide between M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 9654P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC Embedded 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
