Atom x7211RE vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Atom x7211RE by a whopping 1406% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 180 | 2021 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Apple M4 | no data |
Power efficiency | 64.21 | 28.43 |
Architecture codename | no data | Amston Lake (2024) |
Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 14 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 26.95 | 1.79 |
Recency | 30 October 2024 | 8 April 2024 |
Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
Threads | 14 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 6 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 1405.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x7211RE, on the other hand, has 566.7% lower power consumption.
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7211RE in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Atom x7211RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Atom x7211RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.