Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
28.50
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
30.52
+7.1%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking186159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency85.2553.12
DesignerAppleAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataStrix Halo (2025)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed2.592 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP11
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 16-core GPUAMD Radeon 8060S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 28.50
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 30.52
+7.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 19529
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 22023
+12.8%

CrossMark Overall

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 2141
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 2274
+6.2%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 351
+10.7%
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 317

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 20458
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 21269
+4%

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) 3844
+29.1%
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 2978

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.50 30.52
Recency 30 October 2024 6 January 2025
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 55 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 71.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395, on the other hand, has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 71 vote

Rate M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 44 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max 395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.