Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 170 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 82.46 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 16-core GPU | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 16 |
| Threads | 12 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 120 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 9 9900X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
